| Legal ForumsRegisterSign inBankruptcyBusinessCriminalEmploymentFamilyImmigrationReal EstateMore... | ChatUpcomingArchiveHelpAsk a LawyerToday's Q&AAsk a QuestionAsk a Lawyer ArchiveTopic Schedule |
| Legal Forms & DocumentsState Law and AgenciesU.S. ConstitutionFederal Courts & LawsU.S. Small Claims CourtFederal Government AgenciesLegal DictionaryFree Case Law Research |

The First District Court of Appeals recently provided some guidance on what is necessary for an Employer/Carrier to deny a temporary partial disability (TPD) claim based upon voluntary limitation of income. In Whitaker v. North American Tank Lines, Inc., the Judge of Compensation Claims ruled that despite the fact that the claimant was limited in using his upper extremity and felt he could not do his work as a truck driver, he had voluntarily limited his income and therefore was not entitled to TPD benefits. The first DCA reversed holding that in order to assert a voluntary limitation of income defense, The Employer/Carrier has the burden of proving that at least one job exists within the claimant’s restrictions. In Whitaker, the Employer/Carrier did not prove that the truck driving job, or any other job, was within the claimant’s work restrictions.
Disclaimer: The information provided on Lawyers.com is not legal advice, Lawyers.com is not a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or should be formed by use of the site. The attorney listings on Lawyers.com are paid attorney advertisements and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by Lawyers.com or any approved or authorized lawyer referral service. Your access to and use of this site is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

